<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is California leading the way? Pray not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitalmarketsu.com/is-california-leading-the-way-pray-not/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitalmarketsu.com/is-california-leading-the-way-pray-not</link>
	<description>Investor Education for Main Street America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Dreamin</title>
		<link>http://capitalmarketsu.com/is-california-leading-the-way-pray-not/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>California Dreamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalmarketsu.com/?p=1053#comment-56</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been said many times that California doesn&#039;t have a revenue problem; It has a spending problem.  Just like the author, I too am a conservative Californian.  I love my state, but in their desperation, its legislators have indeed thought up some down right scary &quot;solutions&quot; to the financial problems here.  I feel a little more uncomfortable here with each passing year as taxes continue to rise, regulations increase, and businesses leave for more friendly states.  

There is no single solution to CA&#039;s complex problems, but change must start on a local level. We can help by encouraging our elected officials to spend our tax dollars wisely.  I live in Los Angeles County, and I&#039;m seeing some glimmers of hope with the county Board of Supervisors.  Recently, they reissued an RFP for vendor services to operate the county&#039;s GAIN case management services (a welfare-to-work program).  I expect the same two companies will submit proposals as last year - incumbent Maximus Inc. and newcomer Policy Studies Inc. (PSI). 

Maximus has maintained its contract with the county for many years now, but its cost to the taxpayers keeps skyrocketing.  If the new bids resemble those from last year, we can expect that the Maximus bid will cost taxpayers almost a million dollars more than PSI&#039;s.  What&#039;s more, Maximus has a track record of poor performance.  Under its latest three year contract, Maximus has been cited repeatedly for failing to meet required goals in 5 of 8 categories (according to the LA Times).  Last year, the Department of Public Social Services favored PSI based on scoring done on the two companies by a neutral third party.  PSI scored 9,082 out of 9,616 possible points in the procurement process, whereas Maximus scored 7,824 of 9,616.  PSI won by a 13% margin on technical score and also submitted the lowest bid, which was 6% cheaper. 

Even worse, Maximus has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to buy the support of the Board of Supervisors through lobbying and campaign donations. 

I am grateful that the BOS reissued the RFP and am confident they will select the right choice for LA.  In these tough economic times, we need our local elected officials to scrutinize how every tax dollar is being spent and eliminate waste wherever possible.  California doesn&#039;t have to continue its downward spiral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been said many times that California doesn&#8217;t have a revenue problem; It has a spending problem.  Just like the author, I too am a conservative Californian.  I love my state, but in their desperation, its legislators have indeed thought up some down right scary &#8220;solutions&#8221; to the financial problems here.  I feel a little more uncomfortable here with each passing year as taxes continue to rise, regulations increase, and businesses leave for more friendly states.  </p>
<p>There is no single solution to CA&#8217;s complex problems, but change must start on a local level. We can help by encouraging our elected officials to spend our tax dollars wisely.  I live in Los Angeles County, and I&#8217;m seeing some glimmers of hope with the county Board of Supervisors.  Recently, they reissued an RFP for vendor services to operate the county&#8217;s GAIN case management services (a welfare-to-work program).  I expect the same two companies will submit proposals as last year &#8211; incumbent Maximus Inc. and newcomer Policy Studies Inc. (PSI). </p>
<p>Maximus has maintained its contract with the county for many years now, but its cost to the taxpayers keeps skyrocketing.  If the new bids resemble those from last year, we can expect that the Maximus bid will cost taxpayers almost a million dollars more than PSI&#8217;s.  What&#8217;s more, Maximus has a track record of poor performance.  Under its latest three year contract, Maximus has been cited repeatedly for failing to meet required goals in 5 of 8 categories (according to the LA Times).  Last year, the Department of Public Social Services favored PSI based on scoring done on the two companies by a neutral third party.  PSI scored 9,082 out of 9,616 possible points in the procurement process, whereas Maximus scored 7,824 of 9,616.  PSI won by a 13% margin on technical score and also submitted the lowest bid, which was 6% cheaper. </p>
<p>Even worse, Maximus has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to buy the support of the Board of Supervisors through lobbying and campaign donations. </p>
<p>I am grateful that the BOS reissued the RFP and am confident they will select the right choice for LA.  In these tough economic times, we need our local elected officials to scrutinize how every tax dollar is being spent and eliminate waste wherever possible.  California doesn&#8217;t have to continue its downward spiral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.751 seconds -->
